Time to retire mandatory retirement for judges?

Prompted by the news that Chief Justice Gerry Alexander is positioning himself for mandatory retirement in 2011, the Spokesman-Review has an editorial today that says we should re-think the judicial retirement issue.

The state constitution was amended in 1951 to require judges to step down when they turn 75. The Spokesman-Review points out that life expectancy has gone from 66 years to 78 since the 1950s. Another problem with the mandatory retirement is that the governor appoints a replacement rather than allowing voters to select a judge.

The piece pays a backhanded compliment: “Alexander shows no signs of cognitive failings” – picture the Chief in his office – “Gee, thanks!” At the very least, says the editorial, judges who turn 75 should be permitted to serve out the remainder of their term.

More of Today's Opinions: Borrowed judges, borrowed cars

City of Spokane v. Rothwell, No. 81271-3. Two men convicted of DUI in the city of Spokane appeal and challenge that the judge who presided over their cases lacked jurisdiction. Although the city operated a municipal court, all of their judges were borrowed from Spokane County District Court. Defendants allege that RCW 3.46.050 and 070 (repealed in 2008) required that municipal court judges be elected from within the city limits. The Court of Appeals overturned the convictions. Here, the Court unanimously reverses the court below and reads the conflicting statutes to require that the election be limited to the city only for full-time and not part-time municipal court judges. The latter must be elected, but from what district is not specified by statute. Justice Jim Johnson wrote the Court's opinion. (briefs and argument)

In Re Forfeiture of One 1970 Chev. Chevelle and One 2004 Nissan Sentra, No. 81116-4. Thomas Roos was using both of his parents' cars for trafficking illegal drugs, presumably to cut overhead costs and pass the savings on to his customers. During one of four arrests in the summer of 2005, police seized the vehicles pursuant to RCW 69.50.505. His parents appeal the seizure based on the "innocent owner" exception. That provision allows a property owner to prevent seizure upon showing that the crime was done "without the owner's knowledge." The courts below rejected this argument, but the Court today reverses those decisions and sides with the parents. The majority opinion by Justice Charles Johnson and joined by four other justices notes that statutes often use language like "actual or constructive knowledge" or "knows or has reason to know." The Legislature did not extend "knowledge" in this statute, thus a property owner is not required to show that he had no reason to know of the illegal activity, only that he actually did not know.

Justice Madsen, joined by Justices Owens, Fairhurst, and Jim Johnson, concurs as to the Sentra and dissents on the Chevelle. "Because the Rooses did not take steps to prevent Thomas' use of the second car, the Chevelle, even after they knew of his arrest in the Nissan with a 110-gram brick of cocaine, I would uphold the hearing officer's forfeiture of the Chevelle."(briefs and argument).

Judicial political contributions

The issue of money in judicial elections is a hot one right now. It’s the subject of Supreme Court cases, John Grisham novels, and legislative proposals. But what about the issue of judicial money in elections? Turns out Washington State Supreme Court justices contribute modest sums during campaign season. Who do they give money to? Who gives the most? Who gets the most from colleagues? (Details after the jump.)

2008 Supreme Court justice contributions

Listed below is each justice with the candidates he or she contributed to during the 2008 election season. Justices Fairhurst, C. Johnson, and Stephens were up for election in 2008.

Chief Justice Gerry L. Alexander (total: $150)

  • Mary Fairhurst (Supreme Court) – $50
  • Charles Johnson (Supreme Court) – $50
  • Samuel Meyer (District Court) – $50

Justice Charles W. Johnson (total: $250)

  • Mary Fairhurst (Supreme Court) – $250

Justice Barbara Madsen (total: $575)

  • Mary Fairhurst (Supreme Court) – $300
  • Charles Johnson (Supreme Court) – $125
  • Debra Stephens (Supreme Court) – $100
  • Theodore Spearman (Superior Court) – $50

Justice Richard B. Sanders (total: $2,300)

  • Charles Johnson (Supreme Court) – $200
  • Debra Stephens (Supreme Court) – $200
  • Timothy Ford (Court Of Appeals) – $1,400
  • Charles Williams (Superior Court) – $500

Justice Tom Chambers (total: $2,450)

  • Charles Johnson (Supreme Court) – $1,000
  • Mary Fairhurst (Supreme Court) – $1,000
  • Robin Hunt (Court Of Appeals) – $250
  • Nicholas Corning (Superior Court) – $100
  • Theodore Spearman (Superior Court) – $50
  • Monica Benton (Superior Court) – $50

Justice Susan Owens (total: $1,375)

  • Mary Fairhurst (Supreme Court) – $500
  • Debra Stephens (Supreme Court) – $250
  • Charles Johnson (Supreme Court) – $300
  • Robin Hunt (Court Of Appeals) – $125
  • Jean Rietschel (Superior Court) – $100
  • Monica Benton (Superior Court) – $50
  • Mariane Spearman (Superior Court) – $50

Justice Mary E. Fairhurst (total: $550)

  • Charles Johnson (Supreme Court) – $250
  • Debra Stephens (Supreme Court) – $100
  • Robin Hunt (Court Of Appeals) – $100
  • Carol Murphy (Superior Court) – $100

Justice James M. Johnson (total: $250)

  • Charles Johnson (Supreme Court) – $250

Justice Debra L. Stephens (total: $325)

  • Charles Johnson (Supreme Court) – $100
  • Nicholas Corning (Superior Court) – $200
  • Annette Plese (Superior Court) – $25

Bill to provide public financing for judicial races

A bill has been introduced in the Washington Legislature that would allow public financing of judicial races. The sponsors acknowledge the state's budget crisis by making the program contingent on the state allocating $3 million sometime in the future.

Washington state's 2006 Supreme Court elections were hotly contested, and a similar bill was introduced last year in response. Rep. Sam Hunt, a sponsor of this year's bill, chairs the committee to which the bill has been assigned. He plans to hold a hearing in the next few weeks. The Olympian has more here.