<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>In re PRP of Shawn Dominique Francis - Supreme Court of Washington Blog</title>
<link>http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/articles/oral-argument/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 07:18:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:01:13 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Today&apos;s arguments, May 13, 2010</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The court hears four cases today. (<a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/appellate_trial_courts/supreme/calendar/?fa=atc_supreme_calendar.display&amp;year=2010&amp;file=docspr10#20100513">Docket</a>, <a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/appellate_trial_courts/coaBriefs/index.cfm?fa=coabriefs.briefsByHearingDate&amp;courtId=A08&amp;year=2010#a20100513">briefs</a>)</p>
<p><u>Morning session</u></p>
<p><em>In re PRP of Shawn Dominique Francis</em>, No. 82619-6. Whether the defendant waived his double jeopardy challenge to multiple convictions by pleading guilty to the crimes.</p>
<p><em>State v. Irby</em>, No. 82665-0. Whether the trial court in a criminal prosecution violated the defendant&rsquo;s constitutional right to be present when it dismissed some potential jurors outside the defendant&rsquo;s presence after conferring with defense counsel and the State by email.</p>
<p><u>Afternoon session </u></p>
<p><em>In re W. Russell Van Camp</em>, No. 200,799-6. Whether an attorney can avoid suspension while the bar association&rsquo;s recommendation for disbarment is heard on appeal.</p>
<p><em>Guillen, City of Sunnyside v. Contreras</em>, No. 82531-9. A man was killed in a drug deal and the police seized his car and money. The family of the man asked the judge to return the seized property, which the court did at one-quarter of its value. The question is whether the claimant in an action to recover property seized in a controlled substances investigation &ldquo;substantially prevailed,&rdquo; and thus was entitled to an award of attorney fees, even though she recovered in value less than one-quarter of the assets she sought.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/2010/05/articles/oral-argument/todays-arguments-may-13-2010/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/2010/05/articles/oral-argument/todays-arguments-may-13-2010/</guid>
<category>Guillen, City of Sunnyside v. Contreras</category><category>In re PRP of Shawn Dominique Francis</category><category>In re W. Russell Van Camp</category><category>Oral Argument</category><category>State v. Irby</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 07:18:45 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Michael Reitz</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>
