damages - Supreme Court of Washington Blog http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/articles/opinions/ en-us Copyright 2011 Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:25:01 -0800 Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:29:15 -0800 http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Opinion: Legal Malpractice Damages Shoemake v. Ferrer, No. 81812-6. Attorney Douglas Ferrer badly mishandled Andrea and Keith Shoemake's lawsuit related to Andrea Shoemake's serious injuries from a 1992 automobile accident. As a result of his legal malpractice, the case was dismissed in 1996. Ferrer mislead the Shoemake's about this until 2005. The Shoemake's retained another attorney and eventually recovered a $100,000 insurance settlement and then prevailed in a legal malpractice suit against Ferrer. The trial court awarded the Shoemake's ten years of interest on $60,000, which was the amount of the insurance settlement minus the 40% contingency fee that Ferrer would have received.

The Shoemake's appealed and the Court of Appeals found that the interest should have been based on the full $100,000. Today, in an opinion written by Justice Stephens, the Supreme Court unanimously upholds that decision.

We affirm the Court of Appeals and follow the approach favored by the majority of jurisdictions. In this case, calculating damages without deducting a negligent attorney's hypothetical contingency fee is an appropriate measure of damages. The Shoemakes had to expend fees on a second lawyer in order to finish the job the first lawyer neglected to do. The majority approach makes the plaintiffs whole without conferring a windfall.

(briefs and argument)

]]> http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/2010/02/articles/opinions/opinion-legal-malpractice-damages/ http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/2010/02/articles/opinions/opinion-legal-malpractice-damages/ Debra Stephens opinionOpinionsattorney disciplinedamagesshoemake v. ferrer Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:25:01 -0800 Trent England