Court to rule tomorrow on death penalty cases

The Supreme Court is scheduled to release its decision tomorrow in the case of Brown, Gentry and Stenson v. Vail, No. 83474-1. Three death row inmates are challenging the constitutionality of Washington's lethal injection procedure. A Thurston County Superior Court ruled last year that the state's procedures were constitutional. Subsequently, the Department of Corrections changed its protocol from a three-drug cocktail (which the inmates objected to) to a one-drug system.

For more information on this case see this Associated Press article. Click here for more background on capital punishment in Washington state.

Arguments in capital punishment case

The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in the appeals of death row inmates Cal Coburn Brown, Jonathan Gentry, and Darold Stenson. The prisoners are challenging the state's lethal injection protocol as unconstitutional. Convicted murderer Brown had been scheduled for execution in March 2009 when the Supreme Court approved a last minute stay to allow his case to be consolidated with the challenge of the lethal injection practice.

The practice was upheld by Thurston County Superior Court judge Chris Wickham in July of last year. Earlier this month the State recently sought to have the appeal dismissed as moot as the Department of Corrections has changed its lethal injection protocol.

We've written about the state's policy on capital punishment -- it has long been upheld as constitutional.

Today's arguments can be seen here on TVW.

State will seek execution of Cal Coburn Brown

In March, the Washington Supreme Court issued an 11th hour stay in the scheduled execution of convicted murderer Cal Coburn Brown. Brown's case had been consolidated with another case before Thurston County Superior Court Judge Chris Wickham where inmates were challenging the constitutionality of Washington state's method of lethal injection. 

Today Judge Wickham affirmed the state's practice.  With this ruling, the Attorney General's Office says it will once again seek Brown's execution.

It is possible, however, that the Supreme Court will not lift the stay of execution until Judge Wickham's order comes up on appeal, giving the Supreme Court an opportunity to review the constitutionality of lethal injection. 

Click here for more information about capital punishment in Washington state.

Dissent in Brown's stay of execution

On March 12 the Supreme Court issued an order staying the execution of convicted murderer Cal Coburn Brown, by a 5-4 vote. Justice James Johnson, one of the dissenting justices, has filed an opinion in support of his vote, writing that in the 18 years since Brown murdered his victim, he has been given ample opportunity for judicial review.

Capital punishment in Washington State

The scheduled (and subsequently delayed) execution of Cal Coburn Brown has renewed discussion about capital punishment in Washington state. State law (Chapter 10.95 RCW) governs capital punishment, and the death sentence is only imposed for convictions of aggravated first degree murder. The state utilizes two methods of capital punishment: lethal injection and hanging. Lethal injection is used unless the inmate chooses death by hanging. Since 1904, 77 men have been executed in Washington, with the most recent in 2001.

Cal Coburn Brown was convicted for the 1991 murder of 22-year-old Holly Washa. Brown was scheduled to die by lethal injection on March 13, 2009. On March 11, Thurston County Superior Court Judge Chris Wickham denied Brown’s motion to stay his execution, pending the outcome of a consolidated case, in which an inmate is challenging the constitutionality of death lethal injection. On appeal, the Washington State Supreme Court stayed Brown’s execution while the constitutionality of the state’s lethal injection policy is resolved.

The Washington Constitution, Art. I, sec. 14, prohibits “cruel punishment.” The state Supreme Court has treated this phrase as generally equivalent to the federal counterpart that prohibits “cruel and unusual punishment.” Numerous Washington court decisions have held that capital punishment is not unconstitutional, State v. Yates (2007), and death by hanging does not constitute “cruel punishment.” State v. Frampton (1981).

Cal Coburn Brown, and fellow inmate Darold Ray Stenson, are challenging the state Department of Correction policy for lethal injection (pdf), arguing that the procedure can result in extreme pain for the condemned, and thus violates the state and federal prohibitions. Thurston County Superior Court is scheduled to hear argument in this matter May 2009.

Supreme Court orders stay of execution

Just days after denying a petition, the Supreme Court has agreed to stay the execution of Cal Coburn Brown, scheduled for March 13, following consolidation with another case challenging the constitutionality of lethal injection. The order is signed by Justice Charles Johnson, with Alexander, Owens, Fairhurst, and James Johnson dissenting.

The Department of Corrections has information about capital punishment in Washington state.

UPDATE: The Associated Press has more details about the stay of execution.