<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Cambridge Townhomes v. Pacific Star Roofing - Supreme Court of Washington Blog</title>
<link>http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/articles/opinions/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:46:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:35:59 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Tomorrow&apos;s opinions, June 18, 2009</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Washington Supreme Court will issue rulings in four cases tomorrow. </p>
<p><em>Cambridge Townhomes v. Pacific Star Roofing</em>, No. 81003-6. Whether summary judgment was appropriate where a breach of contract and indemnification was claimed as a result of construction defects. (<a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/appellate_trial_courts/coaBriefs/index.cfm?fa=coabriefs.briefsByHearingDate&amp;courtId=A08&amp;year=2009#a20090210"><strong>Briefs </strong></a>and <a href="http://www.tvw.org/media/mediaplayer.cfm?evid=2009020025D&amp;TYPE=V&amp;CFID=3283641&amp;CFTOKEN=59313838&amp;bhcp=1 "><strong>argument</strong></a>.)</p>
<p><em>Campbell v. Ticor Title Insurance Co</em>., No. 80999-2. Does the title company have a duty to defend an insured-landowner in a suit against the landowner to reform the landowner's deed? (<a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/appellate_trial_courts/coaBriefs/index.cfm?fa=coabriefs.briefsByHearingDate&amp;courtId=A08&amp;year=2009#a20090312 "><strong>Briefs </strong></a>and <a href="http://www.tvw.org/media/mediaplayer.cfm?evid=2009030017B&amp;TYPE=V&amp;CFID=3283641&amp;CFTOKEN=59313838&amp;bhcp=1 "><strong>argument</strong></a>.)</p>
<p><em>Homestreet, Inc. v. Dep&rsquo;t of Revenue</em>, No. 80544-0. Can a taxpayer receive tax deductions for revenue received from interest payments? (<a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/appellate_trial_courts/coaBriefs/index.cfm?fa=coaBriefs.briefsByHearingDate&amp;courtId=A08&amp;year=2008#a20080916 "><strong>Briefs </strong></a>and <a href="http://www.tvw.org/media/mediaplayer.cfm?evid=2008090070B&amp;TYPE=V&amp;CFID=3283641&amp;CFTOKEN=59313838&amp;bhcp=1 "><strong>argument</strong></a>.)</p>
<p><em>State v. Koslowski</em>, No. 80427-3.&nbsp;Whether the trial court in a prosecution for robbery and burglary violated the defendant&rsquo;s right of confrontation by admitting into evidence statements by the unavailable victim in response to police questioning after the crimes were completed. The victim died prior to trial of causes unrelated to this case. (<a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/appellate_trial_courts/coaBriefs/index.cfm?fa=coaBriefs.briefsByHearingDate&amp;courtId=A08&amp;year=2008#a20080916 "><strong>Briefs </strong></a>and <a href="http://www.tvw.org/media/mediaplayer.cfm?evid=2008090070A&amp;TYPE=V&amp;CFID=3283641&amp;CFTOKEN=59313838&amp;bhcp=1 "><strong>argument</strong></a>.)</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/2009/06/articles/opinions/tomorrows-opinions-june-18-2009/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/2009/06/articles/opinions/tomorrows-opinions-june-18-2009/</guid>
<category>Cambridge Townhomes v. Pacific Star Roofing</category><category>Campbell v. Ticor Title Ins. Co.</category><category>Homestreet, Inc. v. Dept of Revenue</category><category>Opinions</category><category>State v. Koslowski</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:46:10 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Michael Reitz</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>
