Today's arguments: May 27, 2010
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in four cases today (briefs and docket).
In the morning session:
Internet Community & Entertainment Corp., d/b/a Betcha.com v. State, No. 82845-8. In 2007, Internet Community & Entertainment Corp. was informed by agents of the Washington State Gambling Commission that its website Betcha.com was engaged in illegal gambling. The company sued the state seeking a declaratory judgment that its social wagering site does not violate state law. Betcha.com lost at the trial level. On appeal, the Court of Appeals held that because Betcha.com customers agreed in advance that participants were not required to pay their losses, Betcha.com was not engaged in “gambling” as defined in the Gambling Act.
Rousso v. State, No. 83040-1. Lee Rousso, an amateur poker player, is challenging the state’s ban on internet gambling, arguing it violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Poker Players Alliance filed an amicus brief in support of Rousso's case.
In the afternoon session:
In re Detention of Gale West, No. 82568-8. In a civil commitment trial for an alleged sexually violent predator (SVP), does the respondent have a right to discover an expert witness’s prior evaluations of other suspected SVPs? Is it permissible for a witness to testify about the conditions and treatment phases at the Special Commitment Center?
In re Detention of Charles W. Post, No. 83023-1. In a civil commitment trial for an alleged sexually violent predator, is evidence about the treatment available at the Special Commitment Center admissible? Is evidence that a respondent, if released, could later be subject to another commitment proceeding upon commission of a “recent overt act” admissible?
