The court's 2009 statistics (YTD)

Last week the Supreme Court of Washington concluded its Spring Term. With that milestone, we are introducing a new feature here at the blog. Every term we will track the opinions and votes of each justice, and will provide a spreadsheet with a case-by-case breakout. Here are the raw numbers for January - June 2009.

 A few trends are worth noting in the charts below.

 Number of Opinions by Justice 

Justice

Majority Opinions

Concurring Opinions

Dissents

Total Opinions

Alexander

2

1

3

6

C.Johnson

4

0

3

7

Madsen

8

9

5

22

Sanders

5

1

8

14

Chambers

10

0

1

11

Owens

3

1

1

5

Fairhurst

5

2

4

11

J.Johnson

0

1

1

2

Stephens

10

2

1

13

 (more after the jump)

 

Frequency in the Majority 

Justice

Majority Votes*

Total Votes

% in Majority

Unanimous Opinions**

Alexander

 37

 47

 79%

 1

C.Johnson

 40

 47

 85%

 2

Madsen

 41

 47

 87%

 1

Sanders

 33

 46

 72%

 3

Chambers

 41

 47

 87%

 7

Owens

 43

 47

 91%

 2

Fairhurst

 38

 45

 84%

 3

J.Johnson

 37

 47

 79%

 0

Stephens

 37

 40

 93%

 4

*Including concurring votes
**Including cases that were unanimous in results only

 

Number of Decisions by Vote Count

Splits

Number of Cases

% of Total

9-0

22

46%

8-1

3

6%

8-0

1

2%

7-2

4

8%

6-3

10

21%

6-2

1

2%

5-4

7

15%

 

A few observations:

Justice Debra Stephens did not participate in a number of cases where she joined the court after the case was argued, or cases in which she participated as a judge on the Court of Appeals before she was elevated to the Supreme Court. Even so, the court's junior member has been busy, writing 10 majority opinions this year -- the most for any justice (a position she shares with Justice Tom Chambers, who also wrote ten).

Justice Barbara Madsen takes top marks as the most prolific justice, writing 22 opinions so far, while Justice Richard Sanders continues to enjoy his role as the court's inveterate dissenter. Sanders authored eight dissenting opinions, including a case where he dissented to his own opinion. (The case, State v. Daniels, was decided in 2007, with Sanders as the majority author. The Ninth Circuit subsequently ruled on a similar issue, but reached the opposite conclusion. The state Supreme Court granted a motion for reconsideration in Daniels, but upheld Sanders' original ruling, with Sanders dissenting.) 

Unlike the U.S. Supreme Court, which sees many narrow 5-4 decisions, the state Supreme Court enjoys a number of strong majority opinions, with nearly half of its rulings unanimous or 9-0 in the outcome. Justices will frequently concur in the result of an opinion, while employing a separate rationale for reaching his or her conclusion.

(Note: Feel free to use these numbers, but we'd appreciate if you'd cite the Supreme Court of Washington Blog as the source.)

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/admin/trackback/144100
Comments (2) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Kris Tefft - July 8, 2009 9:07 PM

This is very interesting, Mike, and useful. Thanks for doing it. One further observation about Chief Justice Alexander. It is, or at least used to be, the case that the Chief Justice, by virtue of his or her administrative duties, takes on less case assignments per term. So CJ Alexander's somewhat low opinion numbers would seem to have an asterisk by them. Interesting, though, that a couple other justices have similar numbers without the break from case assignments.

Mike Reitz - July 8, 2009 9:29 PM

Kris, a good point -- one I neglected to make.

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.